I recently wrote a response to an article in the opinion section of the Gilroy Dispatch, our local newspaper. The article was by the editorial board, recommending voters to keep the current school board. They described my own campaign in an unflattering manner, so I wrote them a letter, which they had the courtesy to print.
It has been interesting to see the commentary on the Dispatch website about the article, from both those supporting my candidacy, and from those opposed to it. Both sides had good points, and the concerns from those who want to keep our current board were understandable.
They addressed the concern we often have when someone new runs for office. Is this person prepared for the office? Are they competent to do a good job? Those are questions I also often ask when deciding where my vote is going.
I do believe I can do as good a job as any of the school board members, and that is not to take anything away from them. Each board member has his or her strengths, and I bring mine as well.
I also can see that in looking at my platform, which in contrast to the generalities we often see in politics, I tried to be as specific about as possible, there can be some misunderstanding. Some of the concerns expressed seemed to originate from reading into my platform what I did not intend. Wording is everything sometimes.
For example:
Instead of saying our High School graduates could be “highly skilled engineers,” through visionary vocational programs, perhaps it would have been served my point better to say, “well prepared for an entry level job in engineering (or computer science).” As a student who originally studied in this field, the mathematics involved for entry-level work is entirely possible at the High School level.
I also could have stated that one of my points, a review committee of curriculum, I intended as an intense relationship between GUSD and nearby colleges. Of course every school district addresses curriculum in one way or another. My proposal was an idea of continual review and research, capped by a yearly conference, which would present (and review) the research and results. Partnering with colleges in a more integrated and intense manner.
One of the last concerns brought up was with my point on the way the district deals with truancy. Here is just a difference of opinion. The chronically truant student may be truant for many reasons, from economic to emotional/family problems. My idea was to implement community service as a consequence of early truancy for students that often are not headed for graduation.
How do we deal with that? First, Saturday school, where students sit and do little, also accomplishes little. Will that convince a student to go to school? Second, community service builds a sense of self-worth and community. It all depends on what you believe motivates young people to invest in themselves by willingly pursuing education.
I by no means ever meant to give the impression that I’m expert on education. I am, however, passionate about education, and am willing to look at all possibilities of how we can improve our school system. I believe in continuous research and self-assessment, and consider myself a perpetual student.
We have good candidates to choose from this upcoming election for School Board in my opinion. It is not so much a matter of any candidate not having the ability, but more about deciding which candidates you believe will focus on the areas you feel are important. That’s a good thing. If I’m elected, I look forward to working with any of the current school board members, and doing my part keep the bar high.
The following is the letter I wrote to the Dispatch:
Dear Editor,
I respect the Editorial Board’s position on who they would like to see on the Gilroy Unified School District Board, but feel it necessary to respond to the editorial based on your word choice in describing my bid for one of the seats. My decision to run was based on years of thinking about the ways in which I could be of service in my community, and a participant in my government.
As an teacher and parent, our school district’s policies and governance is one of the areas that has been of great interest to me. My thinking, priorities and values, have been fundamentally shaped by my education, therefore, serving on the school board appealed to me when I was asked to run.
The lessons I’ve learned about the nature of politics since campaigning have been many, but the first was that politicos expect you to have money. I had none. I believe in a participation in government because you want to be of service, and you believe that your ideas and effort can be effective. For me, that is what’s important, not the amount of cash you have to spend.
I have walked neighborhoods, talking to people about who I am, and how I want to serve, and the response has been overwhelmingly positive. True, I don’t have the signs, nor social connections of the incumbents. True, I’m not interested in mud-slinging, and character assassination. But also true, is that I have a very unique background, and a perspective as a teacher and parent with children in the school district that I believe is an asset. I bring a much more “diverse” type of diversity than the current board is offering, coupled with the ability and skill set for the position, despite not having the money to trumpet this from our local hilltops.
All of which is to say that the word “timid,” the word used and defined as “lacking in courage and self-confidence,” is insulting not just to me, but to all of our citizens.
Everyone shares the same rights to government participation, no matter their economic condition. I feel confidant that my ideas and values both matter, and can be effective, and I somehow gathered enough “courage” to run for office. I try to present a campaign based on ideas of substance, without resorting to grandstanding and vague promises.
Has that seemed “timid”? Perhaps a better word might have been underfunded. I’ll continue to talk to constituents about the issues, and do my best to make this “timid” campaign worthy of the word “timely.”
Dom Payne, Gilroy
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a comment »